Nutrient Management Planning

Nutrient Management Planning for New York State Golf Courses 4 Soil nutrient mapping allows for the spatial assessment of nutrient needs that can be addressed efficiently by timing application to climatic and turfgrass growth rate. PACE Turf’s free Climate Appraisal Form and GP model offer excellent resources for establishing baseline nutrient application schedules (Figure 5). Users input local weather data (30-year average temperature and rainfall) to estimate turfgrass growth, nutrient needs, and withdrawals from the soil. Location: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Avg T (F) 30.4 32.9 39.6 50.0 59.7 69.0 74.1 73.0 66.1 55.3 45.9 35.8 Rainfall (in) 3.7 3.0 4.2 4.5 4.2 4.2 4.0 3.9 4.5 4.6 3.8 4.2 Grass Maximum N/month lb/1000 sq ft = 0.50 Optimum Growth Temperature (F) = 68 Set to 68 for cool season and 88 for warm season grass Variance = 10 Set to 10 for cool season and 12 for warm season grass % Growth Potential 0 0 2 20 71 100 83 88 98 45 9 1 Total lb/1000 sq ft Removed from Soil ppm Plus MLSN ppm N lb/1000 sq ft 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 2.6 NA NA K lb/1000 sq ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.18 0.25 0.21 0.22 0.25 0.11 0.02 0.00 1.29 42 79 P lb/1000 sq ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.32 11 32 Ca lb/1000 sq ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.26 8 339 Mg lb/1000 sq ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.16 5 52 S lb/1000 sq ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.19 6 13 Fe lb/1000 sq ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.013 0 44 Mn lb/1000 sq ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.005 0 6 Sunken Meadow State Park, Kings Park, NY An annual nitrogen (N) rate is established and then applications can be calibrated monthly to plant growth and nutrient demand, which affects turfgrass growth and subsequent soil drawdowns of P, K, and micronutrients. The nutrient depletion estimate is detailed in the column titled “Removed from the soil ppm.” Next to that is a column of “Plus MLSN ppm” values that should be compared with soil test values and the MLSN guidelines to maintain soil nutrient levels that support turfgrass growth. It is important to recognize and differentiate high-traffic from low-traffic turf areas, as well as newly established from mature turf areas, as their nutrient needs vary considerably. The GP model also allows turfgrass managers to predict periods of abiotic stresses (slower turf growth) to schedule cultivation events and other necessary maintenance activities. Observing turf health/ growth in the different management areas pre- and post-fertilization can help to minimize or eliminate unnecessary applications Regular review of soil testing data is a key BMP and helps identify nutrient trends that can inform turfgrass management practices. This method works well for Developing Nutrient Management Recommendations Figure 5. Growth potential model and nutrient management guidelines. fertilization programs utilizing either granular or liquid applications. It is likely that utilizing the GP model in conjunction with MLSN guidelines will result in significant reductions in fertilization applications, lowering water quality risk. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Percent Growth potential Month of Year Monthly Percent Growth Potential Figure 6. GP model for Kings Park, NY.